Modern popular science radio discourse: The principle of dialogicity
نویسندگان
چکیده
The article is devoted to identifying specifics of modern popular science media discourse. authors conduct a comparative communicative-pragmatic and stylistic analysis composition, speech means discursive techniques educational radio programs which have such feature as explicated dialogicality — representing conversation between journalist an expert. leading principle program dialogization: actual dialogue expert supplemented by conditional scientist who does not participate in the program, well generalized addressee representative mass audience. notes moves that contribute dialogization discourse, evaluation criticism expert’s statements host also use “naive listener” mask. tactics illustrative explanation, appeal personal experience, transformation used journalists are considered. note redistribution lexical participants dialogue, characteristic era Internet communication: scientific terminology actively presenter, stylistically low lexemes expert, entails relative uniformity with predominance conversational tonality. This set determines priority communicative position journalist, typical for classical conclude sub-style belongs journalistic style Russian language. discourse creates listener idea him on equal footing. willingness model his mind image possible recipient act interests ensures effectiveness popularization knowledge media.
منابع مشابه
the tragedy of modern man in arthur millers world
what miller wants is a theatre of heightened consciousness. he speaks of two passions in a man, the passion to "feel" and the passion "know". he belives that we can have more of the latter. he says: drama is akin to the other inventions of man in that it ought to help us know more and not merely to spend our feelings. the writing of the crucible shows us that he is trying to give more heightene...
15 صفحه اولترجمه و نقد کتاب the justification of science and the rationality of religious belife
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولThe legacy of Islamic world in modern medicine and science
The legacy of the Islamic world in medicine and natural science is the legacy of Greece, increased by many additions, mostly practical. Rhazes, the Iranian, was a talented clinical observer, but not a Harvey. Abd al-Latif, the Arab, was a diligent seeker in anatomy, but in no way to be compared to Vesalius. The Muslims possessed excellent translations of the works of the Hippocratic Corpus and ...
متن کاملThe legacy of Islamic world in modern medicine and science
The legacy of the Islamic world in medicine and natural science is the legacy of Greece, increased by many additions, mostly practical. Rhazes, the Iranian, was a talented clinical observer, but not a Harvey. Abd al-Latif, the Arab, was a diligent seeker in anatomy, but in no way to be compared to Vesalius. The Muslims possessed excellent translations of the works of the Hippocratic Corpus and ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Medialingvistika
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2312-296X', '2312-0274']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2022.409